Thursday, September 30, 2010

Objectivist Round Up #168



Welcome to the September 30, 2010 edition of the Objectivist Round Up! Each week we feature the best blog posts by Objectivist bloggers. To learn more about Objectivism, visit the Ayn Rand Institute, and to learn more about how to participate in the carnival, visit our carnival homepage (which lives here on this blog).


Aaaaannnd here we go!


Roberto Sarrionandia presents Can Speaking Out be Immoral? posted at Roberto Sarrionandia, saying, "Can risking your life to defend a principle be altruistic?"



Rachel Miner presents Jonah Days posted at The Playful Spirit, saying, "Some thoughts about Jonah Days and what helps keep the smile when it seems like everything is going wrong. Humor is high on my list, but I have other ideas too :)"



C.W. presents THE CHINESE CURRENCY: A BIG SHOE THAT COULD DROP! posted at Krazy Economy, saying, "Big issue in the news is the value of the Chinese Currency. The U.S. wants them to raise its value relative to the dollar. It that good? HA! If Washington wants it, what do you think?"



Amy Mossoff presents LePort Schools' New Web Site posted at The Little Things, saying, "This is a review of the new web site for LePort Schools, which might seem like a dull subject, but anyone interested in how Objectivists are implementing rational ideas in education should check this out."



Diana Hsieh presents Interview with Stephen Bailey posted at NoodleFood, saying, "My interview with Stephen Bailey -- Republican candidate for US House of Representatives for Colorado's Second District -- about his principles and prospects."



Miranda Barzey presents Visit to the High Museum posted at Building Atlantis, saying, "A recent trip to the High Museum in Atlanta includes Bible story lessons, high school-esque gossiping, and a job opportunity."



Zip presents Two Wolves and a Sheep posted at UNCOMMON SENSE, saying, "The greatest threat and failure of Democracy is the ability of 51% to vote away the rights of the other 49%. J.S. Mill and other heavy thinkers called this the tyranny of the majority. With the final vote on the registry tallied at 153 to 151, 50.3% of parliamentarians have indeed managed to dominate the other 49.7%."



John Drake presents In memory of my grandmother posted at Try Reason!, saying, "Tribute to my late grandmother. She was a wonderful woman."



Trey Givens presents My First Apple Purchase: Fail or Character Building? posted at Trey Givens, saying, "I want a Macbook Pro so badly that I paid for it. How come it isn't in my apartment right now? I am MOST displeased."



Mike Zemack presents Toward Real "School Reform" posted at Principled Perspectives, saying, "An intellegent reporter exposes the perenial presidential cherade of "school reform", which over the decades "haven't produced meaningful achievement gains", but plenty of "intellectual dishonesty and political puffery". Still, school reform is a worthy goal, and it's time for the real thing."



David C Lewis, RFA presents The Myth Of Opportunity Cost posted at A Revolution In Financial Planning, saying, "What is opportunity cost? Should you buy that new car with cash, or should you finance it? If you pay cash, aren't you giving up interest you could be earning on your savings?"



Jenn Casey presents Parenting Principles posted at Rational Jenn, saying, "I revisit some of the principles by which I make parenting and discipline decisions, and take a first stab at outlining a few of the premises which are the foundation for those principles."



That concludes this week's edition. If you enjoyed the posts, please share them on Facebook, Twitter, or just email them to your friends!

Sacred Ego will be next week's host. Submit your blog article to the next edition of the Objectivist Round Up using our carnival submission form.

Past posts and future hosts can be found on our blog carnival index page.



Technorati tags:

, .

On Homework

My older kids are 8 and 5, and have recently had their first encounter with the phenomenon known as homework. It's been an interesting experience, and one I've been thinking about quite a lot.

Now, I myself was one of those annoying Hermione Granger types who enjoyed homework--and yes, sometimes even requested more homework. In elementary school, I'd usually complete my work in class. But if I had any to bring home, I'd finish it up and move on with my life. I don't remember too many battles with my parents over homework apart from the occasional procrastination-induced-panic-attack which resulted in some "I told you so" comments from my parents. And even those incidents happened only when I was older, say, 8th grade and up.

I haven't specifically asked Brendan about his homework experience, but I suspect he didn't enjoy homework much (if at all), and probably didn't worry too much about turning it in. I don't know if he was involved in homework battles though.

Talking to neighbors who have kids the same ages as my own in government school, homework is common and voluminous. Yes, even for Kindergarteners, Morgan-y aged kids. And the battles! Oh, the battles over homework start from a very young age, and more than once the kids next door have had to go inside early to get their homework done.

I am really happy not to have this battle-over-homework issue, because we don't really do homework at all. Any work they do is, by definition, homework, and I really don't feel the need to add more work on to what they already do. They also generally pursue things at their own pace and choose their own work to do, so they are pretty self-motivated about the work they do accomplish.

But the opportunity for genuine homework has come. They both take chess through our homeschool co-op, which is a great program for the most part. They teach chess not only at co-op, but after school at schools around Atlanta, and at their location, too. The thing I dislike about the program is the trophies. Every kid gets a trophy! they advertise. And it's true. Every kid gets a trophy--we've got about 10 of them to show for it.

It's not entirely "just show up and put your butt in a seat and receive a trophy" though. Kids can earn an extra trophy by being extra helpful and kind to other kids in the class--Ryan has earned that one twice. They can earn an extra trophy if they beat a coach in a chess game--Ryan has earned that once. And kids can get extra points toward a larger trophy by answering questions in class, winning games, and turning in homework.

This is the first session in which Ryan has ever shown an interest in turning in homework for extra points. I printed out a page--which has four chess puzzles to solve and notate--and he breezed through it for an extra 5 points toward a trophy. The first time he asked me to write down the chess notation for him. He was SO tired, you see.

"Nope!" I said, cheerfully. "This is your homework, so if you want the extra points, then you have to write it down. I'll double check it for you if you'd like, but I'm not going to do it for you."

So, no arguing, he did it. I waited for a battle, but there was none to be had because the decision to turn in this homework was entirely his, and of course, it is entirely optional for this class. So no battling for us. He turned in four more pages of homework yesterday, and Morgan turned in one homework page yesterday, too.

So while our homework experience has been pretty good, I'm of two minds about the value of it. On one hand, it's optional, so the fact that they both completed some homework is a result of their own desires, self-motivation. However, I really hate that the only reason they were motivated to complete the homework in the first place is so that they can get bigger trophies. Before we realized that you can earn a bigger trophy, Ryan used to do the puzzles for the fun of solving them. Now, he's pretty focused on the trophy size. (This is Morgan's first chess session, so she never really did them for fun.)

No, I'm not exactly thrilled about that at all, but I know that it's something that will probably become more common as he takes extracurricular classes. I just asked him whether he'd still do the puzzles even if he didn't think he'd get a bigger trophy, and he said "Yeah, probably."

Next week is Trophy Week. I have no idea if the extra work they did will result in a bigger trophy. I suspect that if someone gets a regular-sized trophy then it will be, for the first time, a defeat instead of a mere prize for taking the class. Would receiving a regular-sized trophy motivate them to turn in even MORE homework sheets next time, or will they give up on the idea entirely? Will it be harder to remember that the puzzles are there for free, for fun, for practice and improving one's understanding and enjoyment of the game? No idea. I wonder if we'll find out.

I think the things they are learning in class are enjoyable to them, and brain-stretching fun. The teachers are wonderful. Ryan and Morgan both enjoy chess a great deal. But so far, even though we were spared Homework Battles, I find that I'm not such a fan of homework after all.

Wednesday, September 29, 2010

A Favorite Parenting Tool Makes a Comeback

I haven't used this one for a while--it seems to make a comeback every time I have a two year old in the house. It's called: "Can you do it all by yourself, or do you need me to help you?" It's applicable in all kinds of situations (and, as it happens, works well with 5 and 8 year olds, too).

Me: "It's time to leave the store! Let's put all the toys back!" (We were at the UPS Store and they have toys for kids.)

Sean: "No! MINE truck!" and glares at me (which is SO super adorable, just FYI).

Me: "Can you put the toy back in the box all by yourself, or do you need me to help you?"

(In this instance, he needed my help.)

Me: "Everyone, let's get our shoes on! Time to go!"

Sean: "NO!"

Me: "Can you put on your shoes all by yourself, or do you need me to help you?"

Etc. It's a great tool for someone who is learning how not to hit (or throw or bite, etc.).

"Can you put the toy down gently, or do you need me to help you?"

"Can you stop your arms from hitting, or do you need me to help you?"

"Can you keep your spit in your mouth, or do you need me to help you?"

This is a favorite of mine because:
  • It sets the expectation that X will get done, no matter what (minimizing battles).
  • It gives the child a choice in the matter.
  • It is a way for me to recognize that sometimes it's hard for the kid to do the necessary thing.
  • It is a way for me to give the child a chance to do the necessary thing (and often they do!).
  • If the child a chooses self-control and independence, then he gets to experience how that feels in a first-handed way.
  • If the child chooses my help, then he can feel supported by me, a nice Mommy who understands that it's hard to do the right thing.
  • It's a respectful way to communicate and guide.

In other words, this handy dandy phrase is well-aligned with my parenting principles. :o)

This post has been brought to you by a day in which I've needed to help people leave a store, and stop blowing loud whistles in the car while I'm driving, and find a kinder way to ask a sister for something.

Monday, September 27, 2010

Guess Who Came to Lunch?

Yaron Brook, that's who! I've met him before, but never really spoken to him at length.

He happened to be in town on business and had a few hours before his flight out of Atlanta, so ARI contacted me to see if I thought anyone might want to meet him for lunch. MIGHT?!?!? Um, yes please!

Thankfully our babysitter extraordinaire was available to stay with the kids for a few hours, so Brendan and I were both able to go. John and Ansley and another John also came.

We asked him questions about current events and what Glenn Beck is like in real life. And we bragged and bragged (okay, I couldn't stop running my mouth) about how rocking awesome the Atlanta Objectivist Society is and told him all about MiniCon (he'd done something similar with a local Objectivist group in the early 90s) and our other events. I think he liked the "Who is John Galt, Y'all?" t-shirt we gave him.

SUPER. AWESOME.

If you want to see a picture of this monumental occasion, check out the ATLOS blog!

PD Tool Card: Mirror

The other day I described an interaction with my kids in which my only role was to describe what I was observing. One of my friends, Hanah, had a question about why I chose this objective-third-party strategy and left this comment:

This is really interesting, and I'm glad it worked. I'm curious about your intervention, though, because it just seems like a weird and unnatural thing to do. You joined the conversation without turning around and facing the people you were talking to. You narrated what was happening as if you were explaining it to a third party instead of to the participants in the situation. Do you speak this way frequently? Is there a theory behind it?

And so I wrote back:


Good question. I'm glad you asked, because I guess it does seem weird! It's not unnatural, because I do this quite a bit.

Sometimes just a statement about what you are observing is a great way to send a message without starting up a big argument or putting people on the defensive.

So "I see a wet towel on the bathroom floor." is often more than sufficient to jog someone's memory, and it's less likely to invite a battle than "Why did you leave a wet towel on the floor?"

I do the observation thing a lot, and that's what I did yesterday. I didn't want to turn around and face them because that invites Ryan to try to get me more involved in the disagreement, and I thought by his tone that he would do that.

So by just making my observation Greek Chorus style and without getting involved too much in their discussion, I helped Morgan gain some words that she then used to support her argument. Knowing what to say and having enough energy to continue the discussion are the things M needs help with most.

Ryan needs help with listening to Morgan's point of view (even if she hadn't re-used my words, my saying her POV is a way for him to hear her message) and would have gladly changed from a battle with Morgan to a battle with me.

And I needed to help them both without getting sucked in.

So it was kind of a WIN-WIN-WIN!

And yes, there is a Positive Discipline Tool Card for this:




Funny, too, because I used the wet towel example in my response to Hanah. I have used this technique so much in the past, and it's one of my favorites--and I never realized until this writing that there was a tool card for it! :o)

Mirror is a great technique because it demonstrates your confidence in the kid's ability to be rational, that this is a problem that they can solve. I also like it because statements of fact really help me keep unnecessary battling to a minimum (yes, I do unnecessary battling, and I'd like to get it down to zero). If someone argues with you, then all you have to do is back away with a "Just sayin'." kind of comment:

Me: "Hey, your bike is still out in the yard."

Kid: "Why do you always tell me to do stuff?" or "SHE left it, not me!" or "But I was just going back outside to ride it!"

Me: "Oh, I'm not telling you what to do, I'm just noticing that it's still outside." or "Oh, I didn't ask who did it, I'm just noticing that it's still outside." or "Oh, I didn't tell you to bring it back in, I'm just noticing that it's still outside."

That's often enough to deflate even your most fervent litigator, who is also then redirected back to your original statement and generally thinks about, and even does, something about the issue at hand.

I LOVE this tool. Do you use it?

Thursday, September 23, 2010

Parenting Principles

A recent thread on OGrownups about getting a toddler to take a nap or rest time in the afternoon got me thinking. And evidently, writing. I did not start out to write a huge post at all. I wanted to write down a few thoughts and the next thing I knew . . . !

Anyway, there were lots of suggestions on the thread for handling this particular issue, and some very interesting insightful comments, too.

Insightful Comment #1 from the parent who had been having the nap time troubles (my emphasis):

This transition will take time.  My son isn't going to go from being a napper to a quiet-time-taker overnight.  Just because we have changed the name and relieved him of the pressure to sleep doesn't mean his new routine will flow just as easily as the name change.  As long as we are consistent with the routine he will get the hang of it.  In the meantime, we will have to deal with some tears and resistance regarding the quiet time, but it will pass!  I am starting to think that transition periods are actually what is most exhausting about parenting. 


Insightful Comment #2 from the other parent (again, my emphasis):

In all seriousness, there are many issues packed into this scenario and I think K [another poster on the thread] and Jenn have hit the nail on the head: the "fix it" solutions will always remain impossible.  N and I have talked about this before, and that is that establishing for yourself certain concrete and specific *expectations* is the extent to which you will be frustrated -- especially in the not-so-neat-and-tidy task of childrearing.

As a passing thought, I think a particular challenge is applying the clear-cut, black and white, principles of anything -- whether it's as broad as philosophy or as specific as parenting, diet, or personal productivity -- to the untidy and unpredictable nature of everyday life.


I absolutely agree, and I think they both have hit on something key, something I have worked very hard to establish in my parenting--the need for principles.


Ayn Rand wrote in "The Anatomy of Compromise" in Capitalism: The Unknown Ideal:

It is only by means of principles that one can set one’s long-range goals and evaluate the concrete alternatives of any given moment. It is only principles that enable a man to plan his future and to achieve it.


And in "Credibility and Polarization" in The Ayn Rand Letter:

Concrete problems cannot even be grasped, let alone judged or solved, without reference to abstract principles.

(both quotations found via the online Lexicon)


Parenting is no exception.

When you are in a stressful, unhappy transition period--outgrowing naps or new baby or tough time at school or (I can imagine) a teen trying to separate and establish more independence--that's when your principles are most needed. They are the foundation you can use for current and future decisions.

I have worked hard to explicitly ground my parenting principles in Objectivism, beginning with the end in mind. The end of parenting, the goal, is to have the kid grow up and be happy. How can he be happy? He needs to be virtuous. How can he learn about the virtues? I think he learns through first-hand experience as he grows up, and he learns with the guidance of Mom and Dad and other adults in his life, too. Another equally important goal of parenting is to be virtuous myself along the way.

Because of this, I have rejected some of the parenting principles by which I was raised. Most notably, I was expected to obey my parents and obey the Catholic god. My happiness was irrelevant. I was to be honest and have integrity, for example, not because they would lead to my own personal happiness, but because I had been commanded by God so I could be happy in another universe. It was the job of my parents to ensure that I learned how to be virtuous according to their standard, and that meant I must obey them.

Another principle I have rejected is punishment and reward-based parenting. I won't go into too many details here, but I will say that it took me years to overcome self-esteem issues and bad premises that were a direct result of fearing punishment or desiring a reward. My attention was on the punishment or reward, and I modified my behavior accordingly. I did not learn to modify my behavior (or internal monologue) to do right because it was the right thing to do, because I wanted to be moral, because I wanted to be happy, until adulthood. It wasn't until my late 20s/early 30s that I got myself corrected for the most part and was able to head my own life in the right direction.

A quick example, a concrete--the punishment for lying in my house was spanking. Because I did not want to be spanked, this is what I learned to do: I learned to lie with a straight face. I learned to be sneaky. I learned that it's best to admit a mistake right away to give my parents the appearance of being an honest kid, to manipulate their trust in me. I learned to lie judiciously and rarely, because if I got caught, I wanted it to be a rare occurrence.

I did NOT learn to be honest.

I was a "good kid" by any one's standards, and didn't get into too much trouble.  It took me YEARS to learn how to be honest with myself, to admit truth for what it is, to break myself of the habit of lying and the fear of punishment. I had no real idea that being honest would be beneficial to me.

(And also I would like to state for the record that I believe my parents both love me very much, and were doing the best they could according to their principles. Their principles are very, very different from mine; but I had a fairly typical upbringing. They were not abusive or over-the-top.)

Okay, so those are principles I've rejected. What have I adopted instead? I've written about them elsewhere, but I'll summarize:

  • I set as few limits as possible, and when I do set a limit, I use the "Life, Limb, and Property" principle. By setting limits according to individual rights, the kids are learning about individual rights.
  • I set limits for rational reasons, and if I can't think of a good reason to say 'no' then I Err on the Side of Freedom, and let the consequences (good or bad) fall where they may. By doing this, my kids (and I!) have explored the limits of what they're capable of accomplishing (often to my delight and surprise) and they learn that sometimes, Mom's got good information about reality that might be useful, and they learn to make rational decisions for themselves in the future.
  • I generally only set limits after the child has demonstrated through his behavior that the limit is necessary. Limits vary individually (see this example of a limit that applies only to Ryan in our house). Sometimes I anticipate limits (such as holding my toddler's hand in a parking lot), but it's rare that I set them with my older children ahead of time.
  • I enforce necessary limits in the most respectful way I can. I empathize with their feelings, and help them learn coping skills. I respect the fact that they are young human beings with developing rational faculties, and so I cannot expect obedience or "because I said so" to be good enough for them, even when they can't truly understand my reasons fully.
  • I have confidence in them, in their ability to one day grasp my reasons for limit-setting. Because I know they will "get it" one day, I explain my reasons every single time--because I cannot know just  when the message will finally sink in, and because I want them to realize that when I must make them do something that it's not because arbitrary consequences rain down from the sky or an authority--it's because I'm trying to protect other people's rights.
  • I problem-solve with them, so that they learn skills for use now and in the future. I expect them to problem-solve with me and not make unreasonable demands. When they make unreasonable demands (and they do, all the time), I insist on proper problem-solving. They learn how to deal with other people rationally through this first-hand experience. They learn that reason--not force--is the way to deal with others, and that mutually agreed-upon decisions often lead to happiness.

Each of these principles (and the above only pertain to discipline issues; there are more) is grounded in Objectivist principles as well as my understanding of child development.  Also, they are grounded in some underlying premises which include:

  • Kids will understand things better if they can experience them first-handedly. Which method would help someone understand addition more effectively? Me providing a list of addition problems and solutions, or me explaining the idea, demonstrating it by using blocks or some other concrete, showing them the notation and how to work it, and then leaving the kid to try some problems on his own? (I do not subscribe to the Dolores Umbridge philosophy of education.) I think the same goes for the virtues. If I tell one of the kids "productive work is fun" it's less effective in getting them to understand that than if I demonstrate my own enjoyment of productive work, talk about my feelings about it and let them pursue productive work independently, which they love.
  • I reject the idea that if left to their own devices, kids will more often than not make bad choices. My kids make bad choices and good choices (so do I). But the percentage is certainly not skewed toward the bad. I think many parents set limits prematurely (I've done this, too) because they think that if they don't set the limit, then little Johnny will probably do the wrong thing. (I think this is a left over idea from the doctrine of Original Sin.) That's often not the case, and if nobody is going to be irreparably harmed or have rights violated, then letting little Johnny experience what happens when he makes a wrong choice is an effective teaching tool (see premise above). Also, if we never give them the chance to make good choices, how will they learn what that feels like?
  • I believe that The Limit's the Thing. I think kids will figure out what they are supposed to learn by experiencing the natural consequences or by having a limit enforced. I do not think they will learn not to lie or hit people or throw toys any more efficiently or effectively if a punishment is added to the limit-setting or natural consequence. I do not think they will want to work harder on their studies or learn new skills quicker if I entice them rewards. 
  • I also believe that children generally want to learn grownup things and do grownup activities and, well, become grownups. No typically developing 18 year old is going to want to play with baby toys. They are watching and learning all the time, because they want to be like us.
  • I take their current stage of development and temperament traits as metaphysically given. That might change later, but if my kid being really sensitive to loud noises right now, then I will work with that, help him cope with that stimulation, and problem-solve. I will not try to stop him from being unusually sensitive to loud noises (I've tried that and it's futile, causes stress, and I think perhaps makes the child feel rejected). If my child is a toddler, I will not expect him to have the patience, self-control, or understanding of an 8 year old.
  • My children do not owe me anything simply because I brought them into existence. They do not owe me respect (Honor Thy Mother and Thy Father) or obedience or elder care. While we are living together, we will work to solve problems together, in a rational, respectful way, so that we can all make this time together as pleasant as possible. But they do not owe me love or anything. When they are legally free of my guardianship, I certainly hope that we continue a happy and fun relationship. I parent the way I do now partly because I think it helps establish that future relationship (as Kelly wrote on OG recently), but our future relationship--which will be mutual--is a secondary parenting goal, not the primary (which is to help them learn the virtues and be virtuous myself while doing it). In fact, if I've been virtuous myself and stuck to my principles, then I will be happy with my part in the process, even if they choose not to maintain a relationship with me in the future. Like I said, I really don't want that to happen, as I think each of my kids interesting and fun and smart and neat to know, but it's a possibility I've faced, a risk I've accepted.

I'm not sure I've identified all of my premises yet, so there might be more later.

When I encounter a particularly perplexing discipline challenge or stage of development, I can and have used those discipline principles above over and over again to help me decide what to do. I choose to use Positive Discipline because those principles align with my parenting principles.

While I cannot say just exactly how I will handle an issue with a tween or teen or even an issue with an adult child--because I haven't yet reached those stages in my parenting career--I can say that I will continue to use my principles to handle issues. If I can't think of a good reason to say 'no' to my teenager wanting to do something I don't particularly like (but which doesn't violate rights or is likely to cause the kid irreparable harm), then I will say 'yes.' I will still continue to insist on problem-solving and respectful communication as the way we can solve problems. Will they always do it? No--they don't do it now (but then again, neither do I). But we will work through those times pretty much the same way we do now.

That's the beauty of having good solid principles--I don't need to know the answer to every single problem ahead of time. I can face issues as they come and use my principles (based on the philosophy I'm trying to live and I hope my children will choose) as a framework for dealing with them. If I continually bump up against my principles, if evidence comes out that contradicts something, then I will need to re-evaluate them. I don't anticipate making any major changes to my parenting principles (whether discipline or non-discipline-related), but I will do so if necessary.

The PD tools I write about and teach classes about are tools that help me stick to my parenting principles. (PD or "gentle discipline" advocates sometimes refer to this type of parenting as a philosophy, but they don't mean 'philosophy' in quite the same way I do when I think about Objectivism as a philosophy. I'm not sure exactly what I'd call it. It's a specific set of principles based on certain premises, certainly, but not an all-encompassing Metaphysics-Epistemology-Ethics-Politics philosophy of life. Probably I am tired and have been working on this post for too long.)

I use and teach PD because it is the best set of parenting ideas (both concrete and abstract) that is out there that fits my own philosophy and principles. I sometimes wonder if I'm misunderstood. I am not a Positive Discipline parent--I am an Objectivist parent who uses Positive Discipline ideas and tools. (And there are lots of parents out there who are not Objectivists who use Positive Discipline presumably because it fits well with their own principles.) And of course I'd love it if everyone used PD, but I'd also love it if everyone became an Objectivist. :o)

So that was way long, and I apologize, but what I wanted to drive at is this question: What are your parenting principles and premises? Do you have them spelled out, and if so, would you like to share? If you disagree with the principles and premises, then I'd love to know why (because I'd really like to know if I'm horribly off-base, for my own selfish reasons). If you are confused, I'd love to know that, too. I didn't really set out to write this post--it started, as I said as a response to a couple of posts on OGrownups. I didn't set out to write it, but obviously I had a lot to say!

Wednesday, September 22, 2010

Even More Trader Principle Progress

As a follow up to last week's post, I just overheard the following exchange:

Morgan: "But, remember? I shared my modeling clay with you! Don't you think I can try?" (I have no idea what it is of his that she wants to try.)

Ryan: "Well, yeah you shared your clay with me, but this is different."

Morgan: "Why?"

Ryan, stumped:  . . .

I hated to intervene, but they seemed to be at an impasse, and because I know that sometimes he triumphs in disagreements out of perseverance, and because I thought Morgan had an excellent point, I said, not turning around from my desk:

"So it sounds like Morgan wants to borrow something and she is reminding Ryan of a time when she shared modeling clay with him." (all in the third person)

Morgan: "Yes. Ryan I am reminding you of when I shared my modeling clay." (somewhat copying the words I offered her)

Ryan: "Well that's a good point. Let me think it over."


Okay, so he didn't agree (yet?), but he conceded the point and at least agreed to think it over. In the meantime, Morgan got on the computer and appears to have forgotten the matter. But still: progress!

Tuesday, September 21, 2010

In Which I Am In Favor of Child Labor (or, On Routines, Empowering Your Kids, and Cleaning Tabata)

Sunday's Family Conference involved a lengthy problem-solving routine chart creation, and I'm going to tell you all about it!

If you weren't aware of this already, it's time for me to share with you a certain disability I have: I am a terrible housekeeper. I do not get a thrill from sweeping or picking up toys or doing the dishes. These are activities that do not warm my heart as such. The bad part of my disability is that I also enjoy such things as pathways free of teeny tiny LEGO pieces, crumb-free (and yogurt-free) couches, and clothing that doesn't stink.

So based on my desire for X level of cleanliness, I must do Y amount of housework. The result, Z, is the set of very, VERY low housekeeping standards which I have carefully cultivated over the years and strive mightily to maintain.

Now, when the babies showed up, I was of course clueless about how that would change the equation. By the time I was pregnant with Morgan, we'd broken down (in my head, this was a failure of some kind) and hired a bi-weekly cleaning service to do the floors and bathrooms and other heavy housekeeping lifting. I LOVE them. It's nice that, for a few hours every other week, my house is CLEAN.

However, time, and budgets, change everything. Brendan and I have been revamping our financial picture (with success, yay!) since the spring, and it's finally time to let go of the cleaning service. It will save us a tidy sum, and honestly, their level of service has gone down somewhat, unfortunately. Then it occurred to me that I have all of these children handy, and they A.) are responsible for much of the mess, B.) need to learn these life skills, in my personal opinion, and C.) are young, spry, and have tiny little arms that will allow them to reach those hard-to-clean places much better than I ever could.

They already do a lot of work around here, and so do I. When I broke out what the cleaning service does for us, it's not really that much more to add to our family workload. Plus, the savings!

Still, I was reluctant to cancel the cleaning service before we had a Plan in place to tackle these extra chores--ideally, a Plan that had been created and agreed upon by all of us (well, except for Sean). Part of the reason for this is obvious, I hope--simply so that we'd have some plan to make sure the work still got done. But the real reason I needed a Plan-with-a-Capital-P is because my children have inherited the housework disability from both of us, and they are, to say the least, unwilling participants in the cleaning processes we already have going. My husband's disability borders on clinical, I'm sorry to say, as he neither notices stinking piles of refuse strewn about the house, nor does he care. (Sorry, honey, but you know that's true.)

And as it happens, this Family Conference habit we've developed (six months strong!) is a fantastic format for hammering out answers to eternal questions such as How in the World are We Going to Keep the House Fit for Human Habitation without Nagging each other into Insanity?

Ryan was the President of Sunday's Family Conference, and I'd told him that I wanted us to work on some group problem-solving. When I got out my flip chart and Only Mommy Markers (as they are known around these parts), the excitement was palpable.

Because I am me, I had a list I'd prepared with tasks and a tentative schedule, not to present this as a phony "let's pretend to get buy-in to something Mom has already decided about anyway" solution, but so that I had at the ready a complete list of tasks to be done--and to show them what we did as a family anyway.

First, we talked about things we already do on a typical day (Morgan had already begun decorating the lists, as she loves to do at the end of the meeting):


See? We ALREADY do all that stuff. It was reassuring to me that they called all that stuff out from memory, as if they'd actually internalized these tasks and might be on their way to building a habit!

Then we listed out things that we do weekly or every other week:


And we put a check mark next to the jobs that the Cleaning Peopleguys do (basically they do floors and bathrooms). The other stuff? We already do, though we don't always keep to a strict schedule about it necessarily.

Then I thought it might be good to list things that need doing less often, like monthly:


Because of my allergies, we really need to be better about checking the air filters. And of course, it just makes good sense to test the smoke alarms every once in a while.

So now we had a basic list, which we'll tweak over time I'm sure, of tasks that we all agreed needed doing. Everyone seemed to think that adding in the work that we are paying the Cleaning Peopleguys to do will be feasible. Brendan agreed to vacuum. Ryan expressed concern about the grossness of cleaning toilets (though he enjoys plunging them, so I can't quite see why cleaning them would be more disgusting than plunging). We agreed that we do our weekly work all together as a family on Saturday mornings. Maybe put in some fun music to make the time go by faster.

So we were done, right? Not so fast! I then expressed my most deepest concern that when it came time to actually work together on a Saturday morning, people would be reluctant. I told them that I think I will feel angry if I don't get cooperation on Saturday mornings, and that they will probably hate it if I have to remind and remind and nag them to do their work. Since our work needs to get done, and we are all agreed on that point, it seems like fighting about it will not be fun and will not make the work get done faster. So what can we think of to do about that problem?

Morgan suggested that if someone doesn't want to help, then they just go take a break. Nice try, sweetie. :o) Ryan suggested something a little more Draconian, though I can't recall just what it was. But everyone seemed to agree that Blitz Cleaning, or Cleaning Tabata, seemed like a fun way to get the work done.

If you aren't familiar with the term tabata, it's used in high-intensity exercise. The basic idea is that you exercise really hard for a short amount of time, rest for a short amount of time, lather, rinse, repeat.

We have used the Cleaning Tabata technique and it is really fun and motivating (so far) for everyone. Morgan doesn't (yet) have the stamina for three full rounds, Ryan and I do (and I'm sure Brendan does, too, he just wasn't here the last time we did this). So here is our tabata schedule:



Now, unlike exercise tabata, our rest intervals get longer, as you may have noticed. That's for my benefit as much as the children's. I hate housework tasks SO much that I really need to rest for longer and longer periods of time in order to get the energy for the next ten minute round.

The older kids and I cleaned this way on Saturday afternoon (a trial run before the Family Conference) and I was simply AMAZED at what we accomplished in 30 minutes of cleaning (that took a little over an hour of our total time). Each time I set the timer and made a big production: "Get Ready, Set, GO!" and Ryan would start screaming and running in circles, flailing his arms. I'd remind him to use that energy to clean, and he did. One thing you might not know about this kid is that when he puts his mind to it, he is a HARD worker. Morgan needed a little more direction, as she tends to wander off and start reading a book, but she worked pretty hard, too, for the first two rounds. About halfway through the third round I had to start giving her specific tasks to carry out, and pretend to chase her (playfully) to get her moving.

After each round of cleaning, we all walked around and appreciated what we'd accomplished. And during the rest periods, we played on the computer or read or book or tended to Sean's needs. That's another cool thing about tabata cleaning--I can stop and do Seanie things like find his game on the computer for him without feeling like I haven't accomplished a task. I'm pretty task-oriented and I hate being interrupted when I'm in the middle of a process. Because we'd scheduled these "interruptions" I was able to be fully present for Sean and not feel grumpy about reading him a book (yes, I do that sometimes, boo).

At the end of every problem-solving session we all agree to try the new plan for a week and check back. This plan will need to be monitored over a longer period of time than a week, but we'll talk about it at our Family Conferences over the next month or so and work on tweaking it a bit. Do we need to vacuum upstairs every week or every other week? Stuff like that. And because I anticipate the enthusiasm for our new plan and our tabata technique wearing thin after a while, we will probably have to do some negotiation/problem-solving about how to keep people working and other ideas for keeping ourselves motivated.

Tomorrow is the last day for the Cleaning Peopleguys (I didn't want to cancel this week on them at the last minute, plus I think it will be easier for us to get off to a good start if the place is semi-clean to begin with). I kind of hate to break the news to them, because the owner of the company is super nice and has been really good to us over the years. I do intend to hire them on an occasional basis for deep cleaning.

But I am SO excited, and I think it would be nice to do a little something for the whole family with some of the money we save!

This post has also been brought to you by the Positive Discipline Tool Cards Routines and Empower Your Kids.



Friday, September 17, 2010

Trader Principle Progress

As you may be aware, we explicitly use, explain, refer to, and discuss the Trader Principle in many of our parenting situations. According to Ayn Rand:

A trader is a man who earns what he gets and does not give or take the undeserved. He does not treat men as masters or slaves, but as independent equals. He deals with men by means of a free, voluntary, unforced, uncoerced exchange—an exchange which benefits both parties by their own independent judgment.

Ayn Rand, "The Objectivist Ethics," The Virtue of Selfishness (via the online Lexicon)

Free exchange and independent equals--this is how we deal with things like sharing and taking turns. You don't have to let your sister take a turn with your toy merely because you owe her some kind of duty because she's your sister or because she's younger or because she needs or wants it. She is not owed a turn merely because she has decided she wants a turn. You have no moral obligation to share toys, and she has no moral claim on your toy by virtue of her desires or needs.

Indeed, this is generally how kids are taught to share. "Give him a turn, he wants it!" "Share that toy because he's a baby!"

A somewhat separate though related issue is that often the adult will swoop in and make a declaration as to which kid ought to have a turn, and skip over the process of teaching kids to negotiate their own terms independently.

But here, we trade. We trade goods (like turns with toys) and services (like help or kind words). If someone really, really doesn't want to share, he doesn't have to (but he may have some negative consequences that go along with that decision, such as a mad friend who stomps home or a sibling unwilling to share with him in the future).

My role is not to make people take turns, but rather to help them negotiate kindly and properly, and only step in where necessary. Sean, at 27 months, sometimes needs a little assistance in letting go, so sometimes I need to pry the toy away from his little hands and help him cope with the ensuing sadness. Ryan (8), who has never been Mr. Willing to Share, needs daily (hourly!) reminders to speak kindly and what to do if someone is touching his stuff. Morgan (5), generally willing to take turns and speak kindly, needs help in surviving the interminable negotiation process. (How could I ever have considered Ryan "not persistent?" That's clearly Crazy Talk, as nobody has his stamina or motivation when it comes to a negotiation.)

And as with any developmental stage or new skill, kids seem to make some forward progress, take a step or two backwards, and then move forward again. We're in Forward Motion around here lately, and it's so enjoyable!

For instance, I was playing Chutes and Ladders with Morgan the other day, and Sean's job was to spin the spinner when it's my turn (always best to give him a job where he can be kind of helpful in such situations). He was resisting handing the spinner back over to M for her turn. She sat there patiently, hand out, and would say in a sweet little voice "Come on, Seanie! It's my turn now, but YOU can have the NEXT turn!" And he would then hand it over of his own volition (though with some pouty face)! The fact that he is able to do this at least sometimes is super great, as he's still quite young.

I was also really impressed with Morgan. By explaining the process, she's helping him get an understanding of turn-taking (first you, then me, then you, then me). And she appealed to his self-interest, that he wanted a turn, and reassured him that he would get what he wants. So cool.

Then yesterday, Ryan surprised me with this exchange:

"Mom, can you help me reach the UNO cards that dropped down by my bookcase?"

Me: "Not right now, because I'm about to take all the garbage to the curb."

Ryan: " Well why don't I help you? That way your work will get done even faster and then you can come help me sooner!"

Me, jumping up and down: "Hooray! Hooray! Hooray! Oh I've waited for this moment my entire life!" (or similar)

So we did that. He worked hard and helped me do my job, and then we came back in and I helped him reach the UNO cards. I played it cool (though inside I was shouting and jumping as previously described), but told him thanks for helping me out. And I mentioned that trading work and kindness helped us both get what we want, and made us happy, too!

It was pretty cool!

Thursday, September 16, 2010

Wednesday, September 15, 2010

I'd Like to Introduce My Daughter, Rupert

We did a little problem-solving at our latest Family Conference, and our solution is so amusing that I absolutely must share it.

Most of us parents have had the following experience when trying to get a child's attention: "Morgan? Morgan? . . . Moooorgaaaaannn . . . Morgan! . . . MORGAN! Aaagggghhhh!"

Right? It's common. They are watching television, or reading a book, or listening to their own inner voices, or generally can't be bothered by what you might have to say because you're only Mom [insert eye-roll here]. It's frustrating because it's no fair when people aren't paying you a lick of attention when you have Something Very Important to Say.

Morgan has this problem, only a few standard deviations away from the norm. If you know her in real life, you understand what I mean. She very often simply isn't aware of, oh, you know . . . the outside world and so this is a problem. A Big Problem for all of us (Brendan has this problem with her, too). We parents (and others) are frustrated in our attempts to get her attention, and she is unhappy to suddenly reawaken to find angry yelling people in her face. And that's how Brendan describes the experience (for Morgan is his child in oh-so-many ways)--you're off, happy in your own Happy Thought Land, and then Suddenly! Without Warning! BLLLLAAARRRRGGGGH! People are screaming your name and are mad.

We've had talks and discussions. We've made plans. I take care to get in her field of vision and touch her shoulder or arm before I speak. Even that has only spotty success. Yes, you can be kneeling down in front of her, hand on her arm, speaking to her and looking directly in her eyes . . . and she can still not be paying attention. I am not making this up.

Also, sometimes I just can't get in her field of vision or touch her. Sometimes I need to get her attention when I'm driving or when she's gone the wrong way around the car in a parking lot and I'm looking for her. I need to be able to call her name and have her A.) Notice, and B.) Respond. I'm just sayin'.

Is this temperamental or learned behavior? I suspect it's temperamental primarily (having lived with Brendan for many years, there's definitely a genetic link here). But I worry that by not helping her figure out how to Notice and Respond that I'm enabling this somehow. Plus, it's really frustrating, as I've mentioned.

So we're trying something new! In the Family Conference, she was perfectly happy to acknowledge that this is a challenge, and she readily agreed that yes indeedy, she sure hates to get surprised by a frustrated Mom or Dad who'd been calling for her. I can't remember who suggested this--Morgan, I think--but the idea was floated that maybe there could be a code word that would get her attention. (We're all into espionage lately, invisible ink, international intrigue, etc. due to a recent foray into classic James Bond films.)

Now part of me thinks the code word ought to be 'Morgan' but as that clearly has been unsuccessful, we decided to give it a try. Her first suggestion was for us to spell her name out M-O-R-G-A-N. We thought maybe that was kind of long, and not such secret code-y. What else? She suggested a couple of other things, like maybe dog or puppy (shocker!).

I suggested that the word ought to be something that she's not at all used to hearing, or perhaps, just silly. Something like that would help get her attention. I pointed to our big black gargoyle, who presides over the household gods on our mantelpiece.


Our household gods and watchers, restored to their proper pla... on Twitpic

See? There he is.

"What about gargoyle?" I suggested.

She didn't like gargoyle, but promptly suggested the gargoyle's name: Rupert! Hilarious!

We role-played a few times, with Brendan and me saying "Rupert!" and Morgan responding "What?" And we laughed and laughed because it is so silly. :o) We agreed to try this for a week and then discuss whether or not it's been helpful. So far, it has been helpful, though I tend to forget to use it.

So now you know why you might hear me say "Morgan? Morgan? RUPERT!" And I don't even care, as long as she'll respond to me in a parking lot!

Tuesday, September 14, 2010

Turning a FAIL into a WIN

It's been a helluva day. To sum up:
  • Sean has an ear infection (mild so far) that has been keeping us up for the last couple of nights. 
  • I wanted to buy Sudafed (because we've had success if we can dry up the fluid in the ear before a nasty feverish infection hits, thereby avoiding penicillin), but couldn't because my driver's license is missing (don't get me started on that, read my Twitter stream for ranty goodness). 
  • Got Brendan to obtain the dangerous potion, met him halfway between work and home to exchange the goods (he received tax papers to take to the accountant, because no good deed goes unpunished!).
  • Tried to get Sean to take the Sudafed. I succeeded in getting approximately 13% of the dose into his body, frustrating and traumatizing us both.
  • Returned home whereupon the big kids promptly woke Sean up from a much-needed (by him and by me) nap.
  • Minor clay disaster.
  • Nail polish on the floor.
  • Yelling by me. :o(

Not my best effort ever.

However, this is where I'm getting better all the time--I realized my awful behavior while it was happening and said "I need a break. I'm taking a break. I don't want to yell any more because it is making me unhappy." And I took said break.

Later, Ryan wanted to talk. It's not fair, says he, that whenever I want to tell him something that's upsetting to me that he has to listen, but sometimes when he wants to say what he is upset about, I shut him down. I listened. He finished his complaint and stared at me challengingly.

I thought about it for a second and then looked at him and said, "You're right. I do that sometimes. I'm sorry."

He interrupted with a pre-fab counter-argument to the thing he thought I was going to say. So I said, "Did you hear me? I just said that you're right about that and I'm sorry about it."

"Oh." says he. :o)

So we worked on a plan for something he can tell me next time I do that. I explained that I didn't want to do that to him, and that it didn't seem fair at all.

Ryan apparently figured that this was a good time to get other injustices off his chest, so he dove right into the next one. One of the things I was fussing at him about earlier was the fact that he borrows my stuff without asking and doesn't return it to its place. He also likes to open up new packages of office supplies (such as boxes of pencils) that I'd prefer to keep in the packages until we need them. That kind of stuff.

Apparently it's not fair that I make him keep the stuff he doesn't want to share up in his room, but then I keep stuff I don't want to share all over the house. Trickier to address. I let him tell me and tell me and tell me, and then I rephrased the problem to make sure I understood.

"You have to keep things you don't want to share up in your room, and you think it's not fair that I can say no to sharing my things that are not up in my bedroom?"

He nodded. Then I had an epiphany!

"Soooo...one of the reasons you feel like you can borrow stuff off my desk and from the kitchen is because it's not up in my room? Even though I've asked you to check with me before you borrow that stuff?"

Assume. Positive. Intent. We had arrived at the crux of our misunderstanding, a misunderstanding that we have a zillion times a day. He's right; I am constantly telling him that if he refuses to share certain toys, then he needs to put that toy in his room. Toys down here, no matter who they belong to, are assumed to be in the general toy rotation, and no fair freaking out if someone has a turn.

He feels put upon, since he feels like this rule applies only to him and not to anyone else in the house, most especially grownups. He'd been blowing me off, partly because of that feeling of injustice and perhaps a bit of genuine confusion.

The fact of the matter is that this rule applies only to him because he is the only one who needs it. If someone asks to have a turn with something of his, he says no 90% of the time. He freaks out 99% of the time he sees someone touching something without permission.

I explained that the purpose of the rule was not that everything downstairs is "in play," but that it's to make things easier on him (and me) because he so often says no and gets so upset about sharing, and sometimes resists my help in working out a plan for taking turns. He'll recall that I rarely, if ever, have asked Morgan to take a toy up to her room--and why? Because she says yes more often than not. My stuff gets to be down here, too, because I say yes most of the time--I just like to be asked if it's certain office supplies (like my stapler and hole punch) so that I can help people remember to return it to my desk (or at least have a clue where in the house it might have been used so that I can locate it).

It was a really good conversation. REALLY GOOD. He listened, I think he understood, and I think he got a sense that this wasn't a limit we'd set just to be mean or unfair to him, that we based it on the things he'd been doing and the things he'd been unable to do. I also talked to him about what needed to happen in order to ditch that limit--he'd need to start saying yes more often than he said no, and he needed to be calmer and more proactive in working out plans (or seeking our help).

I could see his anger dissipate; his face relaxed, he started to smile and joke. Then he tested me out one more time (this is Ryan we're talking about after all!).

"But what about those papers over there? You're ALWAYS making me pick up my things on the floor, you make me move my projects out of the way, and there! THERE! You've left papers!"

He was pointing at my desk, where I'd been sorting the mail. I tend to drop the outer envelopes and junk mail on the floor right next to my desk during the process which had been interrupted by our earlier conflicts.

I pointed out that, as he could clearly see, I hadn't made anybody pick up anything in quite some time. He smiled. I also reminded him that I usually asked him to pick up his projects right away only if they were right in the middle of a pathway.

He said, "Oh yeah! That's right! Because if my project was there [he pointed at the walkway to the kitchen] then everyone would trip and mess it up and aaaaaahhhhh!!! [dramatic reenactment of a pratfall]" More giggling.

By this time we were smiling and laughing, had resolved a few problems, come to a better understanding of each other, some of the rules for our home, and we hugged it out.

So even though this day started off notsogreat, and I was certainly not living up to my own parenting principles for some of it, I'm going to count this day as a WIN.

I modeled how to listen, how to be reasonable, how to do an apology, how to have a civilized problem-solving discussion. I helped him understand that the limits we set are not arbitrary and are fair. I gave him some idea of how he can change things if he wants certain limits to go away. I let him know that I'm willing to uphold our house rules on everyone, even myself. I asked him for help the next time I misbehave, because I want to do better. We looked each other in the eyes and communicated. We shared our problems and hugs.  I got my Positive Discipline mojo back, and helped cultivate some virtues (in myself and in Ryan), too.

Monday, September 13, 2010

This Too Shall Pass

No, not in the Mommy Mantra "oh god is it time for them to go to bed yet?" #mommyneedsacocktail sense.

In the OK GO sense. Our two favorite videos at the moment:



And the marching band version (they look JUST LIKE my old marching band uniforms, Go Bucs!):



Good catchy fun music! The kids are all over it, especially the marching band version.

I've been busy with sick kids and general busy-ness over the last few days, and it appears it will be that way for a while. Hope to be back to regular blogging soon.

Also, I've resized these videos a zillion times and they are still funky looking. Click over to YouTube if it drives you as crazy as it does me--but I am tired of fiddling! :o)

Thursday, September 09, 2010

Objectivist Round Up #165

Welcome to the September 9, 2010 edition of the Objectivist Round Up! I'm happy to be hosting this week.

I've been thinking a lot lately about the link between thought and action, and here is a relevant quotation:

In order to live, man must act; in order to act, he must make choices; in order to make choices, he must define a code of values; in order to define a code of values, he must know what he is and where he is—i.e., he must know his own nature (including his means of knowledge) and the nature of the universe in which he acts—i.e., he needs metaphysics, epistemology, ethics, which means: philosophy. He cannot escape from this need; his only alternative is whether the philosophy guiding him is to be chosen by his mind or by chance.

Ayn Rand, “Philosophy and Sense of Life,” The Romantic Manifesto, 30. (Via the online Ayn Rand Lexicon)


That's at the individual level, and I have talks with my kids about making choices based on values (in a less abstract way) on a semi-regular basis. Here's related quotation (from the same page in the Lexicon) about how ideas shape a culture (my emphasis):

Just as a man’s actions are preceded and determined by some form of idea in his mind, so a society’s existential conditions are preceded and determined by the ascendancy of a certain philosophy among those whose job is to deal with ideas. The events of any given period of history are the result of the thinking of the preceding period.

Ayn Rand, “For the New Intellectual,” For the New Intellectual, 28.

Hmmm....food for thought, yes? And here is more food for thought from a group of Most Excellent Objectivist Bloggers! Enjoy!


Burgess Laughlin presents Is Neoconservatism Dead? posted at Making Progress, saying, "Neoconservatism is largely a subterranean intellectual movement. Though seldom in the news, its foundational principles are a cause of major current events. Neoconservatism is a grave danger to America and thus to all Western Civilization. This article introduces readers to neoconservatism and to a new book that exposes its philosophical nature, historical roots, and poisonous fruit."



Rachel Miner presents School Worries posted at The Playful Spirit, saying, "I share the primary concerns that I have for the start of school. I finish by contemplating if homeschool would be better. Kids are so unique and each decision has so many pros and cons."



Roderick Fitts presents Reduction of the Principle of Egoism posted at Inductive Quest, saying, "This essay analyzes what ideas we would need to understand before we could do a proper induction of egoism, using the Objectivist method of reduction. This is a result of my studies of "Objectivism Through Induction.""



C.W. presents Combating Altruism posted at Krazy Economy, saying, "Many people who do not (could not) practice altruism in their daily lives accept the politics based on altruism. We can use that conflict by making the connection for them, pointedly."



David C Lewis, RFA presents The Inconspicuous Benefit Of Dividend Paying Whole Life Insurance posted at A Revolution In Financial Planning, saying, "In this post, I discuss one way to overcome inflationary pressures of a fiat currency using a simple financial product--life insurance."



Diana Hsieh presents Policy Paper: The 'Personhood' Movement Is Anti-Life posted at NoodleFood, saying, "Ari Armstrong's and my much updated policy paper on the 'personhood' movement -- in defense of abortion rights -- has been published."



Ari Armstrong presents Under Nanny State, We Don't Feel Like Dancing posted at Free Colorado, saying, "A look at a few of the Nanny State controls in NYC and Colorado."



Edward Cline presents The Fatal Links of Servitude posted at The Rule of Reason, saying, "I sometimes imagine myself in the role of a latter day Roman contrarian, living in a time of my country’s certain dissolution on the eve of an invasion by barbarian hordes bent on loot and conquest."



Fred Seiler presents Seeking the Truth: a book by Richard Schlagel posted at Seiler on Science, saying, "This is my brief review of a pro-reason, anti-religion book about the history of science."



Zip presents Guest Blogging posted at UNCOMMON SENSE, saying, "My first ever guest blogger post "The Atheist Conclusion" is up over at Atheist Evolution."



Zip presents Muslim Terrorists and Moderates in Ottawa posted at UNCOMMON SENSE, saying, "For those that claim there are no moderate Muslims the words of Salma Siddiqui, Raheel Raza, and the Muslim Canadian Congress would seem to make a lie of that claim."



Sean Saulsbury presents The American, Flipped posted at The Movie Film Show, saying, "Two new shows this week the best being Flipped--a lovely story about two kids in the 60s who fall in love. Both Mr. Movie and Mr. Film gave it an A grade."



John McVey presents Response to anarchism: answer 1 posted at John J McVey.



Kelly Elmore presents Dragon Con 2010 posted at Reepicheep's Coracle, saying, "This post details my adventures at this year's Dragon Con. It includes pictures of my costumes and descriptions of the panels I went to (both academic and just for fun). Ben Franklin makes an appearance, as does Professor Umbrage."



Sandi Trixx presents Coulter: Having No "Faith" is Worse than Having the Wrong One posted at Sandi Trixx, saying, ""Atheist" is a dirty word to conservatives."



Tod presents Goodbye Mac, Hello Linux posted at Tod.FM, saying, "I recently realized that my actions in the real world were inconsistent with my principles... Since our computers are essential to the expression of ideas, switching to Linux ultimately concerns the freedom and independence of my ideas."



Kelly Valenzuela presents Peachy Keen Pork Chops posted at Modern Paleo, saying, "Great recipe whether you're on a paleo-type diet or not!"



Paul Hsieh presents Doctors Hiring Scribes for EMRs posted at We Stand FIRM, saying, "Yet more "unintended" consequences of health care "reform"."



Miranda Barzey presents My First Dragon*Con! posted at Building Atlantis, saying, "My first ever trip to Dragon*Con in Atlanta!"



Rational Jenn presents Atlanta Objectivist Society Update posted at Rational Jenn, saying, "This is kind of a State of the ATL_OS blog post. We're having lots of fun, and are very, very busy!"



C.W. presents Update: Treasury Grab of Retirement Assets posted at Krazy Economy, saying, "The process by which the Labor Department arrives at a justification for another new law is continuing. Their stated goal is to waste more time and money, and ignore the real threats to our retiring financially comfortably. There are even bigger threats lurking."




That concludes this edition. Submit your blog article to the next edition of the Objectivist Round Up using our carnival submission form.

For more information about participation or hosting the Round Up, check out the information page here on my blog. And of course, you can always email me or leave a comment if you have questions or feedback.  Past posts and future hosts can be found on our blog carnival index page.



Technorati tags:

, .

Wednesday, September 08, 2010

Atlanta Objectivist Society Update

I've been working on two big new projects in 2010 (in addition to the three growing projects I have living here in the house with me, the fun project of being married to Brendan, the rental cabin, keeping up with the blog, thinking, reading, having fun with friends, and improving my health, among other things).

The first project is Cultivating the Virtues with Kelly, which has been a blast so far, and promises to be more interesting in the coming months. The second project has been the Atlanta Objectivist Society.

The topic of last night's OLists Twitter party was community Objectivist groups. It was a fun hour, but boy does it go by fast, and Twitter is sometimes not the best medium for big discussions (but it's great at stimulating lots of ideas!).

I've been working on AOS stuff all day off and on, and we've got some great things ahead of us, but you may not be aware of this if you're not part of our Announcements list or a member of our Facebook page. So I thought it might be fun to share an update on our group here.

We are still having our monthly socials on the third Tuesday of each month. Anyone with a sincere interest in Ayn Rand's ideas is welcome to join us. This idea--to start off with monthly socials--is one of the two greatest ideas I got from the folks at OClubs. I never would have thought to do this on my own, being the introverted type, and having a fairly well-established core group of Objectivists to call friends already. This social idea has been a great way to reach out and get to know other Objectivists here in Atlanta (as well as those new to or newly interested in Ayn Rand's ideas). Some people have come only once, to be sure. And that's okay. It's a great way for everyone to meet and figure out if we like each other well enough to spend more time together. Our next social is September 21, and we will continue these indefinitely.

Tomorrow night, we're going to listen to Earl give a presentation about his architecture project currently underway in Tennessee (read all about it at his blog!). Then on Saturday, we're going to go see it in person. This ties in nicely with a homeschooling idea I'm developing, so I get to kill two birds with one stone. Efficient, that's me.


We have several study groups in development. Kelly is leading a Latin study group, which sounds like fun and I'd so join if I only had a clone! Their first meeting is this Sunday.

One of our members will be hosting a Virtue of Selfishness study/discussion group.  The group will meet monthly and discuss one essay per meeting. The first meeting will happen at the end of September.

Brendan and another guy will be leading a bi-monthly Economics and Finance discussion group to talk about how what's happening in DC affects us, and so people can get ideas for making better investment decisions given the current state of things. Their first meeting will be during the first weekend of October (still trying to finalize details).

Let's see, what else? Oh yes! Our Fall Picnic will happen on Saturday, October 9, and Ansley is heading that up (let her know if you want to bring a potluck dish!). I'm excited for that--I think it will be great to have lots of activities where kids, family, and friends can join us.

Speaking of kids, we are going to have a semi-regular Objectivist Play Group and meet on Fridays at locations around the city. This will be a great way for those of us with kids to get together and for the kids to get to know each other, too. Details still forthcoming, but we did have one such gathering back in spring, and it was FUN.

We're going to have a Holiday Party in December (tentative theme/motto: Reason's Greetings!), too!

There are a couple of fundraisers planned as well (one for November, the other we're not quite sure when). This will help us offset the costs of hosting the website and paying for Facebook ads (which we're currently not running to save money right now).


This is an AWESOME schedule, don't you think? When I first applied to OClubs for their mentor program last year, all I had in mind was "Wouldn't it be great if we could have a kick-butt holiday party?" Now we have 6 Socials, a class on how to write LTEs, and of course, MINICON already under our belts, and all of this other fabulous stuff ahead of us.

And there's even really more going on! People are starting to coordinate their own events, and share ideas (yay!). Once we get the website that lives in my head to live on the internets, I think we will have tons of flexibility and options for people to coordinate just about any kind of event, formal and informal.

We've been asked by lots of people why our group has taken off in such a big way, because it really, really has. A big factor, no doubt, was the fact that we had a strong core group already in place, people who have known each other for years and years. That certainly helps, but is not the only factor in our success. Having awesome people who are willing to work toward our goal (both the people we already knew, and those who joined us after we officially got going with the Socials) is essential.

We are all working hard to build AOS up into the kind of community group we want to have--well, the one I envision at least--which is a group that will, among other things:

  • Be a resource for those in Atlanta (and surrounding areas) who are new to Ayn Rand's ideas and want to learn more; 
  • Provide social and study opportunities for those who want to learn more about Objectivism; 
  • Provide social and study opportunities for those who want to explore mutual interests (such as the Latin group); 
  • Support our local university groups; 
  • Promote activism and the spread of Ayn Rand's ideas (through LTEs, for example); 
  • And also, just have fun with like-minded folks who are actively pursuing their values--whatever they might be--with passion.

We are off to a great start!

PS: I've changed our Twitter handle to the Earl-inspired: @ATL_OS (ATLOS was already taken). Get it? Get it? Atlas? ATL_OS? :o)

Tuesday, September 07, 2010

What I Did On My Labor Day Weekend

[Cue Flight of the Bumblebee by Rimsky-Korsakov]

First things first--a weekend with family, or an out-of-town vacation, must always ALWAYS! begin with lots of procrastination.

Saturday morning was spent furiously cleaningcleaningcleaning the not-as-bad-as-usual house. I remembered to make sure the guest bathroom was presentable (I have failed in this duty numerous times, apparently because I have amnesia that there is a boy who lives at this house and uses that bathroom regularly).

As an added bonus, Ryan contracted a mild (thankfully) bout of Pukinson's Disease, so Morgan and Sean went with Brendan to collect Nonnie and Uncle T from the airport. I wasn't feeling super great either, but fortunately did not contract the yucky Pukinson's.

We hung around the house and caught up on all the latest news, played Beatles Rock Band for a while, and I may or may not have made mojitos for B and his mom. And me. My mother-in-law helped me make some chicken soup, as she had a cold and wanted said soup. Also, she is the best soup-maker in the universe, so I was eager to have some lessons.

Somehow on Sunday I managed to convince Brendan to mow the lawn, and, So It Is Written (Spoken? Nagged?)--So It Shall Be Done. Care to guess which of these I managed to avoid? Was it: marital strife over just how far back certain hedges ought to be pruned, or hives on my arms from trying to prune hedges myself?*

The kids played with their invisible ink sets from Nonnie, and toys they brought from a store up in Wisconsin Dells that sells stuff that changes color in the sunlight. M got a frisbee (goes from clear to red), and hair clips, and Sean got a shirt that changes lots of colors. Ryan got hunting gear (from a different store), including a hunting cap with built-in zillion-watt LED lights. Seriously, don't look at him while it's on; you will go blind.

Let's see, what else? We took walks in the neighborhood to look for snakes (Nonnie is SUCH a good sport about that) and they admired the smartiness of the kids and listened to the ENDLESS stories and made beer brats on the grill for dinner. There may or may not have been more mojitos.

In between family stuff, I tried to stay on top of email and laundry and AOS stuff and what was going on with my sister and brother (my parents visited each of them this weekend), and generally did not succeed. I blame the mojitos.

Monday afternoon saw us heading up to Chickamauga National Battlefield, which took longer to get to than I imagined. Partly it was longer because, well, it was actually farther away than I realized. Partly it was longer because Morgan and Ryan picked on each other and squealed and tattled and punched and complained and tried to make me die an early death on the way up. I actually stopped the car on the way up there to take Morgan out for a "moment" so that she could clearly understand A.) What Needed to Happen and B.) Why It Needed to Happen and C.) OMG It Needed to Happen Right the F Now. Despite my description of our talk here on the blog, I was perfectly composed and appropriately PD, yay!

While up at Chickamauga, we saw just an AWFUL hideous film about the battle (oh god, the horrors, and I'm talking about the acting and writing, not the casualties of the battle). Then we drove to Wilder Brigade Monument and walked around for a while. Right next to the monument was where Eli Lilly (yeah, that guy) and his guys from Indiana were lined up to meet the Confederates. Cool.

I let Brendan take R & M up to the top of the Wilder Monument (no elevator, only about 300 stairs) and then planned to go up with my mother-in-law. However, Sean decided he wanted to go, so up he went! He made it 40 stairs up when some dude let out a spooky Scooby Doo kind of laugh (it was dark in there) and freaked Seanie out. Hmph. Lucky me got to carry him the rest of the way up, and back down, too!

Then we left, got a little lost had an adventure leaving the park, stopped for drinks, and were on our way back home! On the trip home, I had to pull the car over and move Ryan's seat from the back row to the middle. I am proud to say I was PD all the way. Well, in action. Notsomuch in thought. We ate yummy, healthy chicken soup for dinner . . . and skipped the mojitos.

Then this morning I headed out to my doctor's appointment, thankful for convenient and willing babysitters. A mile from the house, one of those ominous engine lights came on, so I had to cancel my doctor's appointment and go to the car dealer instead (still thankful for convenient and willing babysitters!). $99 later, the diagnosis was "probably nothing wrong." Double hmph.

We met Brendan at Peachtree-DeKalb (PDK) Airport and ate lunch at the Downwind Restaurant, then played and watched the airplanes and helicopters for a while. Super fun to do with the kids, and fairly close to Brendan's office, which is nice, since he had to go be a computer peopleguy today.

I'm pleased to report that the Check Engine Light didn't come on once. Whew. Also, I did NOT have to pull the car over on the way there, or the way home, but I had separate conversations with Ryan and Morgan that centered around My Need to Concentrate While Driving on the Highway; How Distracting it is When Someone is Squealing and Punching and/or Trying to Climb out of his/her Seat; and How If This Doesn't Change RIGHT NOW then I Will Only Be Driving Them to Places *I* Need/Want to go to and Not Fun Things Like Chess Class or Playgrounds or Restaurants.

At home we played some games, including Mad Libs (heh), and Sean finally said "Nonnie" and "Uncle T" while looking at them (he'd been playing hard-to-get all weekend). We drove them to the MARTA station (since I couldn't, just couldn't, face Atlanta rush hour traffic given the way R & M had been acting in the car). Apparently, my words and actions finally made an impact, as they were very well-behaved and exhibited self-control and appropriate problem-solving behavior all the way there and back. Whew!

And I also wrote a letter to the editor of the New York Times (with some kind editing assistance from Paul). Will let you know if I make it in.

So that was MY weekend! What did you do?


*Neither was avoided. Of course. But both were remedied. One with a panicked text message to Kelly, my personal OGardener, who had the nerve to be at Dragon*Con all weekend; the other with a little Claritin.

Saturday, September 04, 2010

OGrownups Monthly Summary

August was a pretty active month for OGrownups!

New Members: 8
Total Members: 254

Topics included:
  • Structuring homework
  • Finding good babysitters
  • Inspiring quotations for children's room decor
  • 10 video websites for kids
  • Two new baby announcements (yay!)
  • Collectivist arguments against homeschooling
  • Parenting books: The Your X Year Old Child Series by Louise Bates Ames
  • Secular funerals
  • Baby carrier recommendations
  • The Business of Being Born
  • A birth story
  • Baby supplies
  • McSweeney's article
  • Childhood anxiety
  • Should mothers blog about their kids?
  • First trip to the dentist
  • Things nobody tells you about parenting
  • ADHD misdiagnosis (linked to an article)
  • What to do when a child refuses to read books or play games that are outside of her official age range (though she is capable)
  • Floor beds and infants
  • Discussion of the online article about praising children
  • When are Children adults?
  • Toddler sleeping issues
  • When kids "test" their parents
  • Circumcision rates
  • Preparing kids for a move
  • Free audio books online
  • Teach sign language to babies and toddlers
  • Circumcision
  • BabyCenter.com (updates about stages of pregnancy, childhood development)
  • Decaf coffee and pregnancy
  • Article about epidurals protecting key muscles during labor
  • Humor: What happens when Dad watches the kids?
  • Cooking
  • Blog posts from members include: The CtV podcasts, Teaching by Essentials, World Breastfeeding Week (that's mine!), Temperament, and a link to a hilariously inappropriate kid's book.

Lots of variety! And I can't help but think--there's more where that came from!

If you are interested in learning more about joining OGrownups as a poster or lurker, check out the homepage.